1. a. Dozier W.A. m.fl. (2005) Stocking density effects on growth performance and processing yields of heavy broilers. Poultry Science 84(8): 1332–1338.
b. Estevez I. (2007) Density allowances for broilers: where to set the limits? Poultry Science 86(6): 1265–1272.
c. Hall A.L. (2001) The effect of stocking density on the welfare and behaviour of broiler chickens reared commercially. Animal Welfare 10 (1): 23–40.
2. Frosth S. m.fl. (2020) Identification of Transmission Routes of Campylobacter and On-Farm Measures to Reduce Campylobacter in Chicken. Pathogens 9(5): 363.
3. a. Rayner A.C. m.fl. (2020) Slow-growing broilers are healthier and express more behavioural indicators of positive welfare. Scientific Reports 10: 15151.
b. Wilhelmsson S. m.fl. (2019) Welfare Quality® assessment of a fast-growing and a slower-growing broiler hybrid, reared until 10 weeks and fed a low-protein, high-protein or mussel-meal diet. Livestock Science 219: 71–79.
4. Broom D.M. & Fraser A.F. (2015) Chapter 32: The Welfare of Poultry. I: Domestic animal behaviour and welfare. 5th edition. Oxfordshire, UK, CABI.
5. a. Bailie C.L., Ball M.E.E. & O'Connell N.E. (2013) Influence of the provision of natural light and straw bales on activity levels and leg health in commercial broiler chickens. Animal 7(4): 618–626.
b. Lourenço da Silva, M. I. m.fl. (2021) Behaviour and animal welfare indicators of broiler chickens housed in an enriched environment. Plos one 16(9): e0256963.
6. EFSA (2019) Slaughter of animals: poultry. Scientific opinion. EFSA Journal 17(11): 5849.
7. Ipek A. & Sozcu A. (2017) The effects of access to pasture on growth performance, behavioural patterns, some blood parameters and carcass yield of a slow-growing broiler genotype. Journal of Applied Animal Research 45(1): 464–469.